Dividend comparison
JEPI vs JEPQ: Which Is Better for Income?
Side-by-side yield, projected income, and dividend fundamentals for JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF and JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF. Updated July 26, 2026.
| Metric | JEPI JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF | JEPQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield (TTM) | — | — |
| Dividend / share (TTM) | — | — |
| Price | $56.80 | $57.96 |
| Payout ratio (TTM) | — | — |
| Dividend growth streak | 1 year | 2 years |
| Beta | 0.45 | 0.77 |
| Market cap | $44.75B | $40.35B |
| Exchange | AMEX | NASDAQ |
| Expense ratio | 0.35% | 0.35% |
| Assets under management | $45.34B | $39.16B |
| Number of holdings | 131 | 110 |
| Top 10 concentration | 16.4% | 41.8% |
JEPI
—/mo
Yield data unavailable
JEPQ
—/mo
Yield data unavailable
Payouts are variable rather than contractual, are often taxed as ordinary income, and a fund that pays out more than the strategy earns will see its net asset value drift down over time.
What JEPI vs JEPQ actually do
The equity sleeve is picked from S&P 500 names screened for lower volatility and quality rather than for dividend yield, so it usually moves like a calmer version of the index. Separately the fund holds equity-linked notes whose payoff comes from writing roughly one-month, slightly out-of-the-money calls on the S&P 500 itself, not on the individual stocks it owns. The premium from those notes is distributed monthly, which is why the payout is far larger than the dividends the underlying companies actually pay.
Suits an investor who wants a large monthly cash payment from US large caps and accepts a trimmed share of any strong rally. It fits badly in a high-bracket taxable account, since option income arrives as ordinary income, and badly for an account whose only job is long-run growth.
Moderate-risk equity income
The equity sleeve stays close to the Nasdaq-100 while applying JPMorgan's own research overlay, and equity-linked notes supply the short call exposure on the index. Because Nasdaq-100 options carry higher implied volatility than S&P 500 options, the fund collects more premium and pays a bigger monthly distribution than its S&P 500 sibling. The trade is symmetrical: the underlying portfolio is more volatile, so drawdowns are deeper and the capped upside costs more in a technology-led melt-up.
Suits an income investor who wants exposure to large-cap technology but would rather be paid monthly than wait for capital gains. Not a fit for anyone who wants full participation in Nasdaq rallies or who cannot tolerate a growth-heavy, concentrated portfolio underneath the options.
Aggressive equity income
| Period | JEPI | JEPQ |
|---|---|---|
| 1 month | 1.32% | -2.90% |
| 3 months | -0.91% | -1.75% |
| Year to date | -0.77% | -0.28% |
| 1 year | 2.55% | 9.79% |
| 3 years | 22.63% | 53.17% |
| 5 years | 34.63% | — |
- JEPI
- JEPQ
Both series indexed to 100 on 2022-05-04 using the adjusted closing price series. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
- JEPI
- JEPQ
JEPI131 holdings total
JEPQ110 holdings total
| Name | Weight |
|---|---|
| NVDANVIDIA CORP COMMON STOCK | 7.11% |
| AAPLAPPLE INC COMMON STOCK | 6.61% |
| MUMICRON TECHNOLOGY INC | 4.88% |
| GOOGALPHABET INC-CL C - | 4.66% |
| MSFTMICROSOFT CORP COMMON | 4.09% |
| AMZNAMAZON.COM INC COMMON | 3.69% |
| AMDADVANCED MICRO DEVICES | 3.66% |
| METAMETA PLATFORMS INC | 2.61% |
| AVGOBROADCOM INC COMMON | 2.28% |
| LRCXLAM RESEARCH CORP COMMON | 2.18% |
Quick verdict
Compare the metrics above, then add both tickers to a Dividend Wealth portfolio to see combined income forecasts and diversification impact.
Frequently asked questions
Is JEPI or JEPQ better for dividend income?
What is the difference between JEPI and JEPQ?
Can I hold both JEPI and JEPQ?
Where can I compare JEPI vs JEPQ with my full portfolio?
Related comparisons
For informational and educational purposes only. Not investment advice. Past performance and current yields do not guarantee future results. Verify figures independently before making investment decisions.