Dividend comparison

FTEC vs IGV: Which Is Better?

Fees, yield, total returns, drawdowns, holdings overlap and dividend history for Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF and iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF, side by side. Updated October 21, 2026.

FTEC vs IGV: key differences
The short answer, from the latest data on this page.
  • Fees. FTEC is cheaper at 0.08% a year versus 0.38% for IGV. On $10,000 that is $30 a year less in fees.
  • Income. FTEC pays more income, yielding 0.39% over the last twelve months versus 0.02% for IGV. That is about $37 more a year on $10,000. FTEC pays quarterly, IGV pays annual.
  • Performance. Over the last 5 years, FTEC returned 134.1% versus 24.0% for IGV, with dividends reinvested. $10,000 would have grown to $23,410 in FTEC and $12,396 in IGV.
  • Risk. IGV has been the bumpier ride. Its worst peak-to-trough decline over the last 5 years was -45.8%, against -35.0% for FTEC.
  • Diversification. FTEC holds 294 positions and IGV holds 106. The ten largest positions make up 64.5% of FTEC and 60.2% of IGV.
  • Overlap. 20% of the two portfolios overlap by weight, across 30 shared holdings. They mostly own different companies, so they can complement each other.

Bottom line: FTEC has the edge on these figures, with lower fees, more income today, stronger 5-year returns, smaller drawdowns and broader diversification. IGV does not lead on any of the measures compared here.

Side-by-side snapshot
Trailing twelve-month figures where available. Higher yield is highlighted — not a buy recommendation.
MetricFTEC
Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF
IGV
iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF
Dividend yield (TTM)0.39%0.02%
Dividend / share (TTM)$1.11$0.02
Payout frequencyQuarterlyAnnual
Last dividend$0.3320 on Sep 22, 2026$0.0168 on Jun 18, 2026
Ex-dividend dateSep 18, 2026Jun 15, 2026
Dividend growth (CAGR)3.0% over 4 yrs—
Price$286.87$106.93
Dividend growth streak4 years1 year
Beta1.351.20
Max drawdown (5Y)-35.0%-45.8%
Market cap$17.10B$14.45B
ExchangeAMEXCBOE
Expense ratio0.08%0.38%
Assets under management$22.15B$14.00B
Number of holdings294106
Top 10 concentration64.5%60.2%
Income on a $10,000 investment
Illustrative only — assumes current TTM yield stays constant. Actual distributions change.

FTEC

$3.22/mo

$39 /yr at 0.39% yield

IGV

$0.13/mo

$2 /yr at 0.02% yield

Dividend history
Total dividends paid per share in each calendar year. FTEC pays quarterly; IGV pays annual.
YearFTECIGV
2025$0.9560—
2024$0.9050—
2023$1.1080—
2022$0.8760—
2021$0.8490—
Strategy: Sector and thematic
Funds that hold a single industry or theme, such as technology, semiconductors, healthcare or energy. Funds covering the same sector can still differ in concentration rules: some cap the largest positions while others let the biggest companies take a quarter of the fund. Sector funds are usually used to tilt a portfolio rather than as its core.

A single sector can fall far further than the broad market and stay down for years, and the largest names often dominate the fund.

Performance
Total returns with dividends reinvested, from the adjusted closing price series. $10,000 invested on Oct 20, 2021 would now be worth $23,410 in FTEC and $12,396 in IGV.
PeriodFTECIGV
1 month-1.67%2.47%
3 months6.20%15.00%
Year to date27.69%1.19%
1 year26.49%-6.09%
3 years138.24%57.85%
5 years134.10%23.96%
  • FTEC
  • IGV
41153265202120222023202420252026234124

Both series indexed to 100 on 2021-10-20 using the adjusted closing price series. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Sector allocation
Weight of each sector within the fund. Sectors are aligned on the same row so the two funds can be read against each other directly.
  • FTEC
  • IGV
0%25%50%75%99%Technology99.4%94.4%Application Software51.8%Systems Software44.1%Communication Services0.4%3.8%Advertising2.5%Financial Services0.3%1.5%Interactive Home1.3%Industrials0.3%0.1%Consumer Cyclical0.1%0.2%Energy0.3%Other0.0%0.3%
FTEC vs IGV holdings overlap
20% overlap by weight, with 30 holdings in common. Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for every stock both funds own, so 100% would mean identical portfolios.
Largest shared holdingsFTEC weightIGV weight
MSFTMICROSOFT CORP12.14%8.87%
PLTRPALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC1.68%9.37%
PANWPALO ALTO NETWORKS INC1.13%8.47%
CRWDCROWDSTRIKE HOLDINGS INC0.92%7.67%
ORCLORACLE CORP0.85%6.56%
CRMSALESFORCE INC0.80%4.30%
NOWSERVICENOW INC0.61%4.80%
FTNTFORTINET INC0.46%3.67%
APPAPPLOVIN CORP CLASS A COMMON STOCK USD.000030.42%2.53%
ADBEADOBE INC0.42%3.41%
Top 10 holdings
Largest positions by portfolio weight.

FTEC294 holdings total

NameWeight
NVDANVIDIA CORP17.47%
AAPLAPPLE INC17.14%
MSFTMICROSOFT CORP12.14%
AVGOBROADCOM INC4.09%
MUMICRON TECHNOLOGY INC3.97%
AMDADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC3.40%
PLTRPALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC1.68%
CSCOCISCO SYSTEMS INC1.66%
INTCINTEL CORP1.59%
LRCXLAM RESEARCH CORP1.35%

IGV106 holdings total

NameWeight
PLTRPALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES CLASS A9.37%
MSFTMICROSOFT8.87%
PANWPALO ALTO NETWORKS8.47%
CRWDCROWDSTRIKE HOLDINGS CLASS A7.67%
ORCLORACLE6.56%
NOWSERVICENOW4.80%
CRMSALESFORCE4.30%
FTNTFORTINET3.67%
ADBEADOBE INC3.41%
CDNSCADENCE DESIGN SYSTEMS3.12%

Quick verdict

FTEC has the edge on these figures, with lower fees, more income today, stronger 5-year returns, smaller drawdowns and broader diversification. IGV does not lead on any of the measures compared here. Model the holding inside your real portfolio before deciding.

Still deciding? Compare them in your portfolio
Forecast dividend income, track payouts, and see how FTEC vs IGV fits with the rest of your holdings. Free to start — no credit card required for the trial.

Frequently asked questions

Is FTEC or IGV better for dividend income?
It depends on your goals. FTEC currently yields 0.39% Trailing Twelve Months (TTM) while IGV yields 0.02%. Higher yield means more current income per dollar invested, but may come with different risk, growth, or NAV characteristics. Compare total return and payout sustainability — not just the headline yield.
What is the difference between FTEC and IGV?
Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) is an ETF listed on AMEX. iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV) is an ETF listed on CBOE. Side-by-side metrics on this page cover yield, fees, returns, drawdowns, holdings overlap and dividend history when available.
Which is cheaper, FTEC or IGV?
FTEC has the lower expense ratio. FTEC charges 0.08% a year and IGV charges 0.38%, a difference of $30 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which has performed better, FTEC or IGV?
Over the last 5 years, FTEC has the higher total return with dividends reinvested: FTEC returned 134.1% and IGV returned 24.0%. Past performance does not predict future returns.
Which is riskier, FTEC or IGV?
Measured by the worst peak-to-trough decline over the last five years, IGV has been riskier: FTEC fell as much as 35.0% and IGV as much as 45.8%. Their betas are 1.35 and 1.20.
How much do FTEC and IGV overlap?
About 20% of the two portfolios overlap by weight, across 30 shared holdings. The largest shared positions are MSFT, PLTR, PANW. Holding both still adds meaningful diversification.
How often do FTEC and IGV pay dividends?
FTEC pays quarterly and IGV pays annual.
How much income does $10,000 in FTEC vs IGV generate?
At current TTM yields, $10,000 in FTEC would generate roughly $3.22 per month ($39 annually). The same amount in IGV would produce about $0.13 per month ($2 annually). Actual payouts vary with distribution changes and reinvestment.
Can I hold both FTEC and IGV?
Yes. Many income investors hold both to diversify strategy or index exposure. Whether the combination actually diversifies depends on overlapping holdings and factor exposure. Model both inside Dividend Wealth to see combined income, sector mix, and forecast impact.
Where can I compare FTEC vs IGV with my full portfolio?
Create a free Dividend Wealth account to import or enter holdings, forecast dividend income, and see how FTEC and IGV fit alongside the rest of your portfolio. A 14-day free trial of Standard is available with no credit card required; a limited Free plan is also available.

Related comparisons

For informational and educational purposes only. Not investment advice. Past performance and current yields do not guarantee future results. Verify figures independently before making investment decisions.