Dividend comparison
XYLD vs RDTE: Which Is Better for Income?
Fees, yield, total returns, drawdowns, holdings overlap and dividend history for Global X - S&P 500 Covered Call ETF and Roundhill Investments - Russell 2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF, side by side. Updated October 21, 2026.
- Fees. XYLD is cheaper at 0.60% a year versus 0.97% for RDTE. On $10,000 that is $37 a year less in fees.
- Income. RDTE pays more income, yielding 44.20% over the last twelve months versus 10.44% for XYLD. That is about $3,376 more a year on $10,000. XYLD pays monthly, RDTE pays weekly.
- Performance. Over the last 1 year, XYLD returned 5.6% versus -20.7% for RDTE, with dividends reinvested. $10,000 would have grown to $10,556 in XYLD and $7,928 in RDTE.
- Risk. RDTE has been the bumpier ride. Its worst peak-to-trough decline over the last 1 year was -24.4%, against -18.6% for XYLD.
- Diversification. XYLD holds 505 positions and RDTE holds 4. The ten largest positions make up 39.9% of XYLD and 190.9% of RDTE.
- Size. XYLD is the larger fund with $3.4 billion in assets, against $155 million for RDTE.
Bottom line: XYLD fits better if you care most about lower fees, stronger 1-year returns, smaller drawdowns and broader diversification. RDTE fits better if you care most about more income today.
| Metric | XYLD Global X - S&P 500 Covered Call ETF | RDTE Roundhill Investments - Russell 2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield (TTM) | 10.44% | 44.20% |
| Dividend / share (TTM) | $4.32 | $11.26 |
| Payout frequency | Monthly | Weekly |
| Last dividend | $0.2964 on Sep 24, 2026 | $0.1484 on Oct 16, 2026 |
| Ex-dividend date | Oct 19, 2026 | Oct 15, 2026 |
| Next payment | $0.3140 on Oct 22, 2026 | — |
| Dividend growth (CAGR) | 4.8% over 4 yrs | — |
| Price | $41.40 | $25.48 |
| Dividend growth streak | 1 year | — |
| Beta | 0.41 | 1.04 |
| Max drawdown (5Y) | -18.6% | -24.4% |
| Market cap | $3.41B | $154.0M |
| Exchange | AMEX | CBOE |
| Expense ratio | 0.60% | 0.97% |
| Assets under management | $3.38B | $154.6M |
| Number of holdings | 505 | 4 |
| Top 10 concentration | 39.9% | 190.9% |
XYLD
$87.02/mo
$1044 /yr at 10.44% yield
RDTE
$368.32/mo
$4420 /yr at 44.20% yield
| Year | XYLD | RDTE |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $5.4603 | $13.6433 |
| 2024 | $3.9372 | — |
| 2023 | $4.2377 | — |
| 2022 | $5.3660 | — |
| 2021 | $4.5310 | — |
Payouts are variable rather than contractual, are often taxed as ordinary income, and a fund that pays out more than the strategy earns will see its net asset value drift down over time.
What XYLD vs RDTE actually do
It tracks the Cboe S&P 500 BuyWrite Index, holding S&P 500 stocks and writing one-month calls at roughly the current index level. The mechanics match its Nasdaq sibling, but S&P 500 implied volatility is lower, so the premium collected and the resulting distribution are smaller. The same distribution guideline applies, capped at the lower of half the premiums received or 1% of net asset value.
Suits someone who wants the buy-write structure applied to a broader, less concentrated index than the Nasdaq-100. Not appropriate for an account that still needs capital growth, since full at-the-money overwriting caps the market return that funds it.
High current income, capped upside
| Period | XYLD | RDTE |
|---|---|---|
| 1 month | -0.05% | -4.93% |
| 3 months | 0.61% | -11.16% |
| Year to date | 1.90% | -13.22% |
| 1 year | 5.56% | -20.72% |
| 3 years | 36.95% | — |
| 5 years | 30.19% | — |
- XYLD
- RDTE
Both series indexed to 100 on 2024-09-10 using the adjusted closing price series. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
- XYLD
- RDTE
XYLD505 holdings total
RDTE4 holdings total
| Name | Weight |
|---|---|
| 4IWM 271119C00027810IWM 11/19/2027 27.81 C | 89.61% |
| 4RUT 270319C00252300RUT 03/19/2027 252.3 C | 47.70% |
| 4RUT 261218C002462004RUT US 12/18/26 C246.2 FLX | 43.79% |
| WEEKRoundhill Weekly T-Bill ETF | 6.77% |
| FGXXXFirst American Government Obligations Fund 12/01/2031 | 3.04% |
Quick verdict
XYLD fits better if you care most about lower fees, stronger 1-year returns, smaller drawdowns and broader diversification. RDTE fits better if you care most about more income today. Model the holding inside your real portfolio before deciding.
Frequently asked questions
Is XYLD or RDTE better for dividend income?
What is the difference between XYLD and RDTE?
Which is cheaper, XYLD or RDTE?
Which has performed better, XYLD or RDTE?
Which is riskier, XYLD or RDTE?
How often do XYLD and RDTE pay dividends?
How much income does $10,000 in XYLD vs RDTE generate?
Can I hold both XYLD and RDTE?
Where can I compare XYLD vs RDTE with my full portfolio?
Related comparisons
For informational and educational purposes only. Not investment advice. Past performance and current yields do not guarantee future results. Verify figures independently before making investment decisions.