Dividend comparison
XYLD vs QDTE: Which Is Better for Income?
Fees, yield, total returns, drawdowns, holdings overlap and dividend history for Global X - S&P 500 Covered Call ETF and Roundhill Nasdaq-100 0DTE Covered Call ETF Strategy ETF, side by side. Updated October 21, 2026.
- Fees. XYLD is cheaper at 0.60% a year versus 0.96% for QDTE. On $10,000 that is $36 a year less in fees.
- Income. QDTE pays more income, yielding 44.45% over the last twelve months versus 10.44% for XYLD. That is about $3,400 more a year on $10,000. XYLD pays monthly, QDTE pays weekly.
- Performance. Over the last 1 year, XYLD returned 5.6% versus -18.7% for QDTE, with dividends reinvested. $10,000 would have grown to $10,556 in XYLD and $8,130 in QDTE.
- Risk. QDTE has been the bumpier ride. Its worst peak-to-trough decline over the last 1 year was -24.3%, against -18.6% for XYLD.
- Diversification. XYLD holds 505 positions and QDTE holds 6. The ten largest positions make up 39.9% of XYLD and 191.0% of QDTE.
- Size. XYLD is the larger fund with $3.4 billion in assets, against $913 million for QDTE.
Bottom line: XYLD fits better if you care most about lower fees, stronger 1-year returns, smaller drawdowns and broader diversification. QDTE fits better if you care most about more income today.
| Metric | XYLD Global X - S&P 500 Covered Call ETF | QDTE Roundhill Nasdaq-100 0DTE Covered Call ETF Strategy ETF |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield (TTM) | 10.44% | 44.45% |
| Dividend / share (TTM) | $4.32 | $12.50 |
| Payout frequency | Monthly | Weekly |
| Last dividend | $0.2964 on Sep 24, 2026 | $0.1292 on Oct 16, 2026 |
| Ex-dividend date | Oct 19, 2026 | Oct 15, 2026 |
| Next payment | $0.3140 on Oct 22, 2026 | — |
| Dividend growth (CAGR) | 4.8% over 4 yrs | — |
| Price | $41.40 | $28.13 |
| Dividend growth streak | 1 year | — |
| Beta | 0.41 | 1.25 |
| Max drawdown (5Y) | -18.6% | -24.3% |
| Market cap | $3.41B | $902.1M |
| Exchange | AMEX | CBOE |
| Expense ratio | 0.60% | 0.96% |
| Assets under management | $3.38B | $912.7M |
| Number of holdings | 505 | 6 |
| Top 10 concentration | 39.9% | 191.0% |
XYLD
$87.02/mo
$1044 /yr at 10.44% yield
QDTE
$370.39/mo
$4445 /yr at 44.45% yield
| Year | XYLD | QDTE |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $5.4603 | $13.5402 |
| 2024 | $3.9372 | — |
| 2023 | $4.2377 | — |
| 2022 | $5.3660 | — |
| 2021 | $4.5310 | — |
Payouts are variable rather than contractual, are often taxed as ordinary income, and a fund that pays out more than the strategy earns will see its net asset value drift down over time.
What XYLD vs QDTE actually do
It tracks the Cboe S&P 500 BuyWrite Index, holding S&P 500 stocks and writing one-month calls at roughly the current index level. The mechanics match its Nasdaq sibling, but S&P 500 implied volatility is lower, so the premium collected and the resulting distribution are smaller. The same distribution guideline applies, capped at the lower of half the premiums received or 1% of net asset value.
Suits someone who wants the buy-write structure applied to a broader, less concentrated index than the Nasdaq-100. Not appropriate for an account that still needs capital growth, since full at-the-money overwriting caps the market return that funds it.
High current income, capped upside
| Period | XYLD | QDTE |
|---|---|---|
| 1 month | -0.05% | -2.33% |
| 3 months | 0.61% | -3.43% |
| Year to date | 1.90% | -8.79% |
| 1 year | 5.56% | -18.70% |
| 3 years | 36.95% | — |
| 5 years | 30.19% | — |
- XYLD
- QDTE
Both series indexed to 100 on 2024-03-07 using the adjusted closing price series. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
- XYLD
- QDTE
XYLD505 holdings total
QDTE6 holdings total
| Name | Weight |
|---|---|
| 4QQQ 271119C00070110QQQ 11/19/2027 70.11 C | 73.39% |
| 4NDX 270319C02510150NDX 03/19/2027 2510.15 C | 25.86% |
| 4NDX 261218C024501004NDX US 12/18/26 C2450.1 FLX | 25.04% |
| 4NDX 270611C03059420NDX 06/11/2027 3059.42 C | 22.05% |
| 4NDX 260918C022500004NDX US 09/18/26 C2250 FLX | 18.15% |
| 4QQQ 270917C00070690QQQ 09/17/2027 70.69 C | 17.65% |
| WEEKRoundhill Weekly T-Bill ETF | 5.25% |
| FGXXXFirst American Government Obligations Fund 12/01/2031 | 3.59% |
Quick verdict
XYLD fits better if you care most about lower fees, stronger 1-year returns, smaller drawdowns and broader diversification. QDTE fits better if you care most about more income today. Model the holding inside your real portfolio before deciding.
Frequently asked questions
Is XYLD or QDTE better for dividend income?
What is the difference between XYLD and QDTE?
Which is cheaper, XYLD or QDTE?
Which has performed better, XYLD or QDTE?
Which is riskier, XYLD or QDTE?
How often do XYLD and QDTE pay dividends?
How much income does $10,000 in XYLD vs QDTE generate?
Can I hold both XYLD and QDTE?
Where can I compare XYLD vs QDTE with my full portfolio?
Related comparisons
For informational and educational purposes only. Not investment advice. Past performance and current yields do not guarantee future results. Verify figures independently before making investment decisions.