Dividend comparison
VOOV vs RPV: Which Is Better?
Fees, yield, total returns, drawdowns, holdings overlap and dividend history for Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF and Invesco S&P 500 Pure Value ETF, side by side. Updated October 21, 2026.
VOOV vs RPV: key differences
The short answer, from the latest data on this page.
- Fees. VOOV is cheaper at 0.07% a year versus 0.35% for RPV. On $10,000 that is $28 a year less in fees.
- Income. RPV pays more income, yielding 2.10% over the last twelve months versus 1.64% for VOOV. That is about $46 more a year on $10,000. Both pay quarterly.
- Performance. Over the last 5 years, VOOV returned 68.1% versus 64.1% for RPV, with dividends reinvested. $10,000 would have grown to $16,805 in VOOV and $16,409 in RPV.
- Risk. RPV has been the bumpier ride. Its worst peak-to-trough decline over the last 5 years was -22.6%, against -18.1% for VOOV.
- Diversification. VOOV holds 398 positions and RPV holds 118. The ten largest positions make up 24.7% of VOOV and 22.2% of RPV.
- Overlap. At least 8% of the two portfolios overlap by weight, across 17 shared holdings. They mostly own different companies, so they can complement each other.
- Dividend growth. RPV grew its yearly payout 13.6% a year over the last 4 years, versus 6.2% for VOOV.
- Size. VOOV is the larger fund with $6.8 billion in assets, against $1.7 billion for RPV.
Bottom line: VOOV fits better if you care most about lower fees, stronger 5-year returns, smaller drawdowns and broader diversification. RPV fits better if you care most about more income today and faster dividend growth.
Side-by-side snapshot
Trailing twelve-month figures where available. Higher yield is highlighted — not a buy recommendation.
| Metric | VOOV Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF | RPV Invesco S&P 500 Pure Value ETF |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield (TTM) | 1.64% | 2.10% |
| Dividend / share (TTM) | $3.75 | $2.53 |
| Payout frequency | Quarterly | Quarterly |
| Last dividend | $0.9496 on Sep 25, 2026 | $0.6284 on Sep 25, 2026 |
| Ex-dividend date | Sep 23, 2026 | Sep 21, 2026 |
| Dividend growth (CAGR) | 6.2% over 4 yrs | 13.6% over 4 yrs |
| Price | $228.99 | $120.36 |
| Dividend growth streak | — | 1 year |
| Beta | 0.84 | 0.75 |
| Max drawdown (5Y) | -18.1% | -22.6% |
| Market cap | $6.80B | $1.69B |
| Exchange | AMEX | AMEX |
| Expense ratio | 0.07% | 0.35% |
| Assets under management | $6.80B | $1.68B |
| Number of holdings | 398 | 118 |
| Top 10 concentration | 24.7% | 22.2% |
Income on a $10,000 investment
Illustrative only — assumes current TTM yield stays constant. Actual distributions change.
VOOV
$13.63/mo
$164 /yr at 1.64% yield
RPV
$17.49/mo
$210 /yr at 2.10% yield
Dividend history
Total dividends paid per share in each calendar year. VOOV pays quarterly; RPV pays quarterly.
| Year | VOOV | RPV |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $3.5962 | $2.5877 |
| 2024 | $3.8741 | $1.9479 |
| 2023 | $2.8343 | $1.9558 |
| 2022 | $3.0639 | $1.7831 |
| 2021 | $2.8271 | $1.5523 |
Strategy: Large-cap value
Funds that hold the cheaper half of the large-cap market by price-to-book, price-to-earnings and similar ratios. They lean toward financials, healthcare, industrials and energy, and pay higher dividends than growth funds because mature companies return more cash to shareholders. Funds tracking different value indexes can differ a lot in how many stocks they hold and how they define cheap.
Value can trail the broad market for years at a time when growth companies lead, as it did for much of the last decade.
Performance
Total returns with dividends reinvested, from the adjusted closing price series. $10,000 invested on Oct 20, 2021 would now be worth $16,805 in VOOV and $16,409 in RPV.
| Period | VOOV | RPV |
|---|---|---|
| 1 month | 1.84% | 1.04% |
| 3 months | 2.62% | 1.79% |
| Year to date | 11.78% | 16.45% |
| 1 year | 13.77% | 21.81% |
| 3 years | 63.92% | 81.40% |
| 5 years | 68.05% | 64.09% |
- VOOV
- RPV
Both series indexed to 100 on 2021-10-20 using the adjusted closing price series. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Sector allocation
Weight of each sector within the fund. Sectors are aligned on the same row so the two funds can be read against each other directly.
- VOOV
- RPV
VOOV vs RPV holdings overlap
At least 8% overlap by weight, with 17 holdings in common. Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for every stock both funds own, so 100% would mean identical portfolios.
| Largest shared holdings | VOOV weight | RPV weight |
|---|---|---|
| CCitigroup Inc | 0.74% | 0.83% |
| CVXChevron Corp | 1.38% | 0.68% |
| UNHUnitedHealth Group Inc | 1.13% | 0.67% |
| VZVerizon Communications Inc | 0.65% | 0.61% |
| XOMExxonMobil Holdings Corp | 2.29% | 0.54% |
| COPConocoPhillips | 0.52% | 0.60% |
| TAT&T Inc | 0.57% | 0.46% |
| CBChubb Ltd | 0.39% | 0.48% |
| VLOValero Energy Corp | 0.38% | 2.32% |
| MPCMarathon Petroleum Corp | 0.38% | 2.17% |
Top 10 holdings
Largest positions by portfolio weight.
VOOV398 holdings total
Quick verdict
VOOV fits better if you care most about lower fees, stronger 5-year returns, smaller drawdowns and broader diversification. RPV fits better if you care most about more income today and faster dividend growth. Model the holding inside your real portfolio before deciding.
Still deciding? Compare them in your portfolio
Forecast dividend income, track payouts, and see how VOOV vs RPV fits with the rest of your holdings. Free to start — no credit card required for the trial.
Frequently asked questions
Is VOOV or RPV better for dividend income?
It depends on your goals. VOOV currently yields 1.64% Trailing Twelve Months (TTM) while RPV yields 2.10%. Higher yield means more current income per dollar invested, but may come with different risk, growth, or NAV characteristics. Compare total return and payout sustainability — not just the headline yield.
What is the difference between VOOV and RPV?
Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF (VOOV) is an ETF listed on AMEX. Invesco S&P 500 Pure Value ETF (RPV) is an ETF listed on AMEX. Side-by-side metrics on this page cover yield, fees, returns, drawdowns, holdings overlap and dividend history when available.
Which is cheaper, VOOV or RPV?
VOOV has the lower expense ratio. VOOV charges 0.07% a year and RPV charges 0.35%, a difference of $28 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which has performed better, VOOV or RPV?
Over the last 5 years, VOOV has the higher total return with dividends reinvested: VOOV returned 68.1% and RPV returned 64.1%. Past performance does not predict future returns.
Which is riskier, VOOV or RPV?
Measured by the worst peak-to-trough decline over the last five years, RPV has been riskier: VOOV fell as much as 18.1% and RPV as much as 22.6%. Their betas are 0.84 and 0.75.
How much do VOOV and RPV overlap?
At least 8% of the two portfolios overlap by weight, across 17 shared holdings. The largest shared positions are C, CVX, UNH. Holding both still adds meaningful diversification.
How often do VOOV and RPV pay dividends?
Both pay quarterly. The most recent payments were $0.9496 for VOOV and $0.6284 for RPV.
How much income does $10,000 in VOOV vs RPV generate?
At current TTM yields, $10,000 in VOOV would generate roughly $13.63 per month ($164 annually). The same amount in RPV would produce about $17.49 per month ($210 annually). Actual payouts vary with distribution changes and reinvestment.
Can I hold both VOOV and RPV?
Yes. Many income investors hold both to diversify strategy or index exposure. Whether the combination actually diversifies depends on overlapping holdings and factor exposure. Model both inside Dividend Wealth to see combined income, sector mix, and forecast impact.
Where can I compare VOOV vs RPV with my full portfolio?
Create a free Dividend Wealth account to import or enter holdings, forecast dividend income, and see how VOOV and RPV fit alongside the rest of your portfolio. A 14-day free trial of Standard is available with no credit card required; a limited Free plan is also available.
Related comparisons
For informational and educational purposes only. Not investment advice. Past performance and current yields do not guarantee future results. Verify figures independently before making investment decisions.