Dividend comparison
VCIT vs BSV: Which Is Better for Income?
Fees, yield, total returns, drawdowns, holdings overlap and dividend history for Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF and Vanguard Short-Term Bond ETF, side by side. Updated October 21, 2026.
- Fees. Both charge about 0.03% a year, so cost is not what separates them.
- Income. VCIT pays more income, yielding 5.06% over the last twelve months versus 4.11% for BSV. That is about $95 more a year on $10,000. Both pay monthly.
- Performance. Over the last 5 years, BSV returned 5.2% versus -0.5% for VCIT, with dividends reinvested. $10,000 would have grown to $10,517 in BSV and $9,947 in VCIT.
- Risk. VCIT has been the bumpier ride. Its worst peak-to-trough decline over the last 5 years was -19.6%, against -7.9% for BSV.
- Diversification. VCIT holds 343 positions and BSV holds 30.
- Dividend growth. BSV grew its yearly payout 26.7% a year over the last 4 years, versus 9.8% for VCIT.
Bottom line: VCIT fits better if you care most about more income today and broader diversification. BSV fits better if you care most about stronger 5-year returns, smaller drawdowns and faster dividend growth.
| Metric | VCIT Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF | BSV Vanguard Short-Term Bond ETF |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield (TTM) | 5.06% | 4.11% |
| Dividend / share (TTM) | $3.99 | $3.15 |
| Payout frequency | Monthly | Monthly |
| Last dividend | $0.3398 on Oct 5, 2026 | $0.2680 on Oct 5, 2026 |
| Ex-dividend date | Oct 1, 2026 | Oct 1, 2026 |
| Dividend growth (CAGR) | 9.8% over 4 yrs | 26.7% over 4 yrs |
| Price | $78.81 | $76.53 |
| Dividend growth streak | 4 years | 4 years |
| Beta | 1.07 | 0.38 |
| Max drawdown (5Y) | -19.6% | -7.9% |
| Market cap | $68.71B | $69.61B |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | AMEX |
| Expense ratio | 0.03% | 0.03% |
| Assets under management | $68.70B | $69.60B |
| Number of holdings | 343 | 30 |
VCIT
$42.19/mo
$506 /yr at 5.06% yield
BSV
$34.26/mo
$411 /yr at 4.11% yield
| Year | VCIT | BSV |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $3.8689 | $3.0206 |
| 2024 | $3.5552 | $2.6138 |
| 2023 | $3.0242 | $1.8927 |
| 2022 | $2.3506 | $1.1262 |
| 2021 | $2.6662 | $1.1739 |
Bond prices fall when interest rates rise, and long-duration funds can lose as much as stocks in a fast rate-hiking cycle.
| Period | VCIT | BSV |
|---|---|---|
| 1 month | -1.10% | -0.16% |
| 3 months | -3.82% | -1.49% |
| Year to date | -5.90% | -2.89% |
| 1 year | -6.12% | -2.67% |
| 3 years | 17.12% | 10.31% |
| 5 years | -0.53% | 5.17% |
- VCIT
- BSV
Both series indexed to 100 on 2021-10-20 using the adjusted closing price series. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
- VCIT
- BSV
Quick verdict
VCIT fits better if you care most about more income today and broader diversification. BSV fits better if you care most about stronger 5-year returns, smaller drawdowns and faster dividend growth. Model the holding inside your real portfolio before deciding.
Frequently asked questions
Is VCIT or BSV better for dividend income?
What is the difference between VCIT and BSV?
Which is cheaper, VCIT or BSV?
Which has performed better, VCIT or BSV?
Which is riskier, VCIT or BSV?
How often do VCIT and BSV pay dividends?
How much income does $10,000 in VCIT vs BSV generate?
Can I hold both VCIT and BSV?
Where can I compare VCIT vs BSV with my full portfolio?
Related comparisons
For informational and educational purposes only. Not investment advice. Past performance and current yields do not guarantee future results. Verify figures independently before making investment decisions.