Dividend comparison

VB vs VTWO: Which Is Better?

Fees, yield, total returns, drawdowns, holdings overlap and dividend history for Vanguard Morningstar Small-Cap ETF and Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF, side by side. Updated October 21, 2026.

VB vs VTWO: key differences
The short answer, from the latest data on this page.
  • Fees. VB is cheaper at 0.03% a year versus 0.06% for VTWO. On $10,000 that is $3 a year less in fees.
  • Income. Their trailing yields are almost the same: 1.27% for VB and 1.22% for VTWO. VB pays quarterly, VTWO pays annual.
  • Performance. Over the last 5 years, VB returned 33.5% versus 29.6% for VTWO, with dividends reinvested. $10,000 would have grown to $13,349 in VB and $12,963 in VTWO.
  • Risk. VTWO has been the bumpier ride. Its worst peak-to-trough decline over the last 5 years was -31.9%, against -28.2% for VB.
  • Diversification. VTWO holds 1,969 positions and VB holds 1,357. The ten largest positions make up 5.0% of VB and 3.3% of VTWO.
  • Dividend growth. VB grew its yearly payout 5.3% a year over the last 4 years, versus 5.1% for VTWO.
  • Size. VB is the larger fund with $175.8 billion in assets, against $17.3 billion for VTWO.

Bottom line: VB has the edge on these figures, with lower fees, stronger 5-year returns and smaller drawdowns. VTWO does not lead on any of the measures compared here.

Side-by-side snapshot
Trailing twelve-month figures where available. Higher yield is highlighted — not a buy recommendation.
MetricVB
Vanguard Morningstar Small-Cap ETF
VTWO
Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF
Dividend yield (TTM)1.27%1.22%
Dividend / share (TTM)$3.65$1.36
Payout frequencyQuarterlyAnnual
Last dividend$0.8488 on Sep 30, 2026$0.3911 on Sep 25, 2026
Ex-dividend dateSep 28, 2026Sep 23, 2026
Dividend growth (CAGR)5.3% over 4 yrs5.1% over 4 yrs
Price$288.04$111.40
Dividend growth streak1 year1 year
Beta1.071.14
Max drawdown (5Y)-28.2%-31.9%
Market cap$175.84B$17.30B
ExchangeAMEXNASDAQ
Expense ratio0.03%0.06%
Assets under management$175.80B$17.30B
Number of holdings13571969
Top 10 concentration5.0%3.3%
Income on a $10,000 investment
Illustrative only — assumes current TTM yield stays constant. Actual distributions change.

VB

$10.56/mo

$127 /yr at 1.27% yield

VTWO

$10.15/mo

$122 /yr at 1.22% yield

Dividend history
Total dividends paid per share in each calendar year. VB pays quarterly; VTWO pays annual.
YearVBVTWO
2025$3.4386$1.2429
2024$3.1318$1.0821
2023$3.3170$1.1739
2022$2.9121$1.0413
2021$2.7956$1.0173
Strategy: Small and mid cap
Funds that hold companies below the large-cap tier, where there is more room for growth and less coverage by analysts. Small-cap indexes differ meaningfully: some screen for profitability, some include every listed company, and value-tilted funds lean toward the cheapest names. Those rules drive more of the difference between funds than fees do.

Smaller companies are more sensitive to recessions and borrowing costs, so drawdowns run deeper than in large-cap funds.

Performance
Total returns with dividends reinvested, from the adjusted closing price series. $10,000 invested on Oct 20, 2021 would now be worth $13,349 in VB and $12,963 in VTWO.
PeriodVBVTWO
1 month-0.54%-2.94%
3 months-2.76%-5.41%
Year to date11.67%12.89%
1 year12.20%12.46%
3 years64.64%71.49%
5 years33.49%29.63%
  • VB
  • VTWO
69108147202120222023202420252026133130

Both series indexed to 100 on 2021-10-20 using the adjusted closing price series. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Sector allocation
Weight of each sector within the fund. Sectors are aligned on the same row so the two funds can be read against each other directly.
  • VB
  • VTWO
0%5%10%15%20%Healthcare14.3%20.3%Technology18.5%13.9%Industrials17.5%13.3%Financial Services12.4%17.6%Consumer Cyclical11.4%8.3%Real Estate7.5%6.2%Energy4.3%6.0%Basic Materials4.4%4.7%Consumer Defensive3.4%2.5%Utilities3.2%2.6%Other3.0%4.5%
VB vs VTWO holdings overlap
At least 0% overlap by weight, with 0 holdings in common. Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for every stock both funds own, so 100% would mean identical portfolios.
Top 10 holdings
Largest positions by portfolio weight.

VB1357 holdings total

NameWeight
NTRANatera Inc0.72%
TWLOTwilio Inc0.57%
RVMDRevolution Medicines Inc0.53%
ILMNIllumina Inc0.52%
PEverpure Inc0.52%
OKTAOkta Inc0.44%
MRNAModerna Inc0.44%
EMEEMCOR Group Inc0.42%
CRDOCredo Technology Group Holding Ltd0.42%
JBLJabil Inc0.38%

VTWO1969 holdings total

NameWeight
TWSTTwist Bioscience Corp0.42%
MOG-AMoog Inc0.36%
FROGJFrog Ltd0.35%
TXG10X Genomics Inc0.35%
UMBFUMB Financial Corp0.32%
BTSGBrightSpring Health Services Inc0.31%
GKOSGlaukos Corp0.31%
VSATViasat Inc0.30%
CYTKCytokinetics Inc0.29%
HUTHut 8 Corp0.29%

Quick verdict

VB has the edge on these figures, with lower fees, stronger 5-year returns and smaller drawdowns. VTWO does not lead on any of the measures compared here. Model the holding inside your real portfolio before deciding.

Still deciding? Compare them in your portfolio
Forecast dividend income, track payouts, and see how VB vs VTWO fits with the rest of your holdings. Free to start — no credit card required for the trial.

Frequently asked questions

Is VB or VTWO better for dividend income?
It depends on your goals. VB currently yields 1.27% Trailing Twelve Months (TTM) while VTWO yields 1.22%. Higher yield means more current income per dollar invested, but may come with different risk, growth, or NAV characteristics. Compare total return and payout sustainability — not just the headline yield.
What is the difference between VB and VTWO?
Vanguard Morningstar Small-Cap ETF (VB) is an ETF listed on AMEX. Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF (VTWO) is an ETF listed on NASDAQ. Side-by-side metrics on this page cover yield, fees, returns, drawdowns, holdings overlap and dividend history when available.
Which is cheaper, VB or VTWO?
VB has the lower expense ratio. VB charges 0.03% a year and VTWO charges 0.06%, a difference of $3 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which has performed better, VB or VTWO?
Over the last 5 years, VB has the higher total return with dividends reinvested: VB returned 33.5% and VTWO returned 29.6%. Past performance does not predict future returns.
Which is riskier, VB or VTWO?
Measured by the worst peak-to-trough decline over the last five years, VTWO has been riskier: VB fell as much as 28.2% and VTWO as much as 31.9%. Their betas are 1.07 and 1.14.
How often do VB and VTWO pay dividends?
VB pays quarterly and VTWO pays annual.
How much income does $10,000 in VB vs VTWO generate?
At current TTM yields, $10,000 in VB would generate roughly $10.56 per month ($127 annually). The same amount in VTWO would produce about $10.15 per month ($122 annually). Actual payouts vary with distribution changes and reinvestment.
Can I hold both VB and VTWO?
Yes. Many income investors hold both to diversify strategy or index exposure. Whether the combination actually diversifies depends on overlapping holdings and factor exposure. Model both inside Dividend Wealth to see combined income, sector mix, and forecast impact.
Where can I compare VB vs VTWO with my full portfolio?
Create a free Dividend Wealth account to import or enter holdings, forecast dividend income, and see how VB and VTWO fit alongside the rest of your portfolio. A 14-day free trial of Standard is available with no credit card required; a limited Free plan is also available.

Related comparisons

For informational and educational purposes only. Not investment advice. Past performance and current yields do not guarantee future results. Verify figures independently before making investment decisions.