Dividend comparison
SCHG vs QQQ: Which Is Better?
Fees, yield, total returns, drawdowns, holdings overlap and dividend history for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1, side by side. Updated October 21, 2026.
- Fees. SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% a year versus 0.18% for QQQ. On $10,000 that is $14 a year less in fees.
- Income. QQQ pays more income, yielding 0.53% over the last twelve months versus 0.39% for SCHG. That is about $14 more a year on $10,000. SCHG pays quarterly, QQQ pays annual.
- Performance. Over the last 5 years, QQQ returned 97.0% versus 85.2% for SCHG, with dividends reinvested. $10,000 would have grown to $19,698 in QQQ and $18,525 in SCHG.
- Risk. Their worst declines over the last 5 years were similar: -34.6% for SCHG and -35.1% for QQQ from peak to trough.
- Diversification. SCHG holds 189 positions and QQQ holds 102. The ten largest positions make up 60.9% of SCHG and 47.2% of QQQ.
- Overlap. 60% of the two portfolios overlap by weight, across 47 shared holdings.
- Dividend growth. QQQ grew its yearly payout 13.3% a year over the last 4 years, versus 9.4% for SCHG.
- Size. QQQ is the larger fund with $487.5 billion in assets, against $63.7 billion for SCHG.
Bottom line: SCHG fits better if you care most about lower fees and broader diversification. QQQ fits better if you care most about stronger 5-year returns and faster dividend growth.
| Metric | SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | QQQ Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield (TTM) | 0.39% | 0.53% |
| Dividend / share (TTM) | $0.14 | $3.79 |
| Payout frequency | Quarterly | Annual |
| Last dividend | $0.0371 on Sep 28, 2026 | $0.7514 on Oct 8, 2026 |
| Ex-dividend date | Sep 23, 2026 | Dec 21, 2026 |
| Next payment | — | $0.7941 on Dec 28, 2026 |
| Dividend growth (CAGR) | 9.4% over 4 yrs | 13.3% over 4 yrs |
| Price | $35.53 | $717.63 |
| Dividend growth streak | 4 years | — |
| Beta | 1.20 | 1.23 |
| Max drawdown (5Y) | -34.6% | -35.1% |
| Market cap | $63.06B | $479.05B |
| Exchange | AMEX | NASDAQ |
| Expense ratio | 0.04% | 0.18% |
| Assets under management | $63.70B | $487.46B |
| Number of holdings | 189 | 102 |
| Top 10 concentration | 60.9% | 47.2% |
SCHG
$3.26/mo
$39 /yr at 0.39% yield
QQQ
$4.40/mo
$53 /yr at 0.53% yield
| Year | SCHG | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $0.1168 | $2.7949 |
| 2024 | $0.1163 | $3.0623 |
| 2023 | $0.0903 | $2.3200 |
| 2022 | $0.0817 | $2.1351 |
| 2021 | $0.0817 | $1.6968 |
Concentration in a handful of mega-cap stocks makes these funds swing harder than the broad market in both directions, and they offer little current income.
What SCHG vs QQQ actually do
The index is modified market-cap weighted and excludes financials by rule, which is why it lands so heavily in technology, communication services and consumer discretionary names. In December 2025 the fund converted from a unit investment trust to a conventional open-end fund and cut its fee, so it can now reinvest income and lend securities like its peers. It remains the most liquid Nasdaq-100 vehicle by a wide margin and the reference asset for a large share of the options-income products in this category.
Suits investors who want concentrated large-cap growth exposure and anyone who needs deep options liquidity. Dividends are incidental, so it does not answer an income mandate on its own.
Growth-tilted core, concentrated
| Period | SCHG | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| 1 month | 0.40% | -0.43% |
| 3 months | 4.16% | 3.10% |
| Year to date | 9.29% | 17.09% |
| 1 year | 10.38% | 17.78% |
| 3 years | 99.05% | 105.61% |
| 5 years | 85.25% | 96.98% |
- SCHG
- QQQ
Both series indexed to 100 on 2021-10-20 using the adjusted closing price series. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
- SCHG
- QQQ
| Largest shared holdings | SCHG weight | QQQ weight |
|---|---|---|
| NVDANVIDIA | 12.13% | 8.17% |
| AAPLAPPLE | 11.73% | 7.82% |
| MSFTMICROSOFT | 9.19% | 6.19% |
| AMZNAMAZON COM INC | 5.74% | 4.42% |
| METAMETA PLATFORMS CLASS A | 4.25% | 3.28% |
| GOOGLALPHABET CLASS A | 4.68% | 3.15% |
| GOOGALPHABET CLASS C | 3.75% | 2.94% |
| TSLATESLA INC | 2.71% | 3.02% |
| MUMICRON TECHNOLOGY | 2.69% | 4.41% |
| AVGOBROADCOM INC | 4.00% | 2.49% |
SCHG189 holdings total
Quick verdict
SCHG fits better if you care most about lower fees and broader diversification. QQQ fits better if you care most about stronger 5-year returns and faster dividend growth. Model the holding inside your real portfolio before deciding.
Frequently asked questions
Is SCHG or QQQ better for dividend income?
What is the difference between SCHG and QQQ?
Which is cheaper, SCHG or QQQ?
Which has performed better, SCHG or QQQ?
Which is riskier, SCHG or QQQ?
How much do SCHG and QQQ overlap?
How often do SCHG and QQQ pay dividends?
How much income does $10,000 in SCHG vs QQQ generate?
Can I hold both SCHG and QQQ?
Where can I compare SCHG vs QQQ with my full portfolio?
Related comparisons
For informational and educational purposes only. Not investment advice. Past performance and current yields do not guarantee future results. Verify figures independently before making investment decisions.