Dividend comparison
RDTE vs QDVO: Which Is Better for Income?
Fees, yield, total returns, drawdowns, holdings overlap and dividend history for Roundhill Investments - Russell 2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF and Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF, side by side. Updated October 21, 2026.
RDTE vs QDVO: key differences
The short answer, from the latest data on this page.
- Fees. QDVO is cheaper at 0.56% a year versus 0.97% for RDTE. On $10,000 that is $41 a year less in fees.
- Income. RDTE pays more income, yielding 44.20% over the last twelve months versus 10.69% for QDVO. That is about $3,351 more a year on $10,000. RDTE pays weekly, QDVO pays monthly.
- Performance. Over the last 1 year, QDVO returned 2.1% versus -20.7% for RDTE, with dividends reinvested. $10,000 would have grown to $10,208 in QDVO and $7,928 in RDTE.
- Risk. RDTE has been the bumpier ride. Its worst peak-to-trough decline over the last 1 year was -24.4%, against -17.7% for QDVO.
- Diversification. QDVO holds 45 positions and RDTE holds 4. The ten largest positions make up 190.9% of RDTE and 58.0% of QDVO.
- Overlap. RDTE and QDVO share no holdings, so they behave as separate building blocks.
- Size. QDVO is the larger fund with $763 million in assets, against $155 million for RDTE.
Bottom line: RDTE fits better if you care most about more income today. QDVO fits better if you care most about lower fees, stronger 1-year returns, smaller drawdowns and broader diversification.
Side-by-side snapshot
Trailing twelve-month figures where available. Higher yield is highlighted — not a buy recommendation.
| Metric | RDTE Roundhill Investments - Russell 2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF | QDVO Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield (TTM) | 44.20% | 10.69% |
| Dividend / share (TTM) | $11.26 | $3.15 |
| Payout frequency | Weekly | Monthly |
| Last dividend | $0.1484 on Oct 16, 2026 | $0.2787 on Sep 30, 2026 |
| Ex-dividend date | Oct 15, 2026 | Sep 29, 2026 |
| Price | $25.48 | $29.46 |
| Beta | 1.04 | 1.02 |
| Max drawdown (5Y) | -24.4% | -17.7% |
| Market cap | $154.0M | $767.2M |
| Exchange | CBOE | AMEX |
| Expense ratio | 0.97% | 0.56% |
| Assets under management | $154.6M | $763.0M |
| Number of holdings | 4 | 45 |
| Top 10 concentration | 190.9% | 58.0% |
Income on a $10,000 investment
Illustrative only — assumes current TTM yield stays constant. Actual distributions change.
RDTE
$368.32/mo
$4420 /yr at 44.20% yield
QDVO
$89.08/mo
$1069 /yr at 10.69% yield
Dividend history
Total dividends paid per share in each calendar year. RDTE pays weekly; QDVO pays monthly.
| Year | RDTE | QDVO |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $13.6433 | $2.8784 |
Strategy: Options income
These funds own equities and sell call options against them, converting a share of future price appreciation into cash paid out now. How much upside is surrendered depends on the design: writing at the money on the whole portfolio pays the most and keeps the least, while writing on a partial slice or using purchased offsets keeps more of a rally. Distributions come mainly from option premium rather than from company dividends, so the headline yield is not comparable to a dividend fund's.
Payouts are variable rather than contractual, are often taxed as ordinary income, and a fund that pays out more than the strategy earns will see its net asset value drift down over time.
Performance
Total returns with dividends reinvested, from the adjusted closing price series. $10,000 invested on Sep 10, 2024 would now be worth $9,497 in RDTE and $13,721 in QDVO.
| Period | RDTE | QDVO |
|---|---|---|
| 1 month | -4.93% | -1.41% |
| 3 months | -11.16% | -0.07% |
| Year to date | -13.22% | 1.52% |
| 1 year | -20.72% | 2.08% |
| 3 years | — | — |
| 5 years | — | — |
- RDTE
- QDVO
Both series indexed to 100 on 2024-09-10 using the adjusted closing price series. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Sector allocation
Weight of each sector within the fund. Sectors are aligned on the same row so the two funds can be read against each other directly.
- RDTE
- QDVO
RDTE vs QDVO holdings overlap
0% overlap by weight, with 0 holdings in common. Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for every stock both funds own, so 100% would mean identical portfolios.
Top 10 holdings
Largest positions by portfolio weight.
RDTE4 holdings total
| Name | Weight |
|---|---|
| 4IWM 271119C00027810IWM 11/19/2027 27.81 C | 89.61% |
| 4RUT 270319C00252300RUT 03/19/2027 252.3 C | 47.70% |
| 4RUT 261218C002462004RUT US 12/18/26 C246.2 FLX | 43.79% |
| WEEKRoundhill Weekly T-Bill ETF | 6.77% |
| FGXXXFirst American Government Obligations Fund 12/01/2031 | 3.04% |
Quick verdict
RDTE fits better if you care most about more income today. QDVO fits better if you care most about lower fees, stronger 1-year returns, smaller drawdowns and broader diversification. Model the holding inside your real portfolio before deciding.
Still deciding? Compare them in your portfolio
Forecast dividend income, track payouts, and see how RDTE vs QDVO fits with the rest of your holdings. Free to start — no credit card required for the trial.
Frequently asked questions
Is RDTE or QDVO better for dividend income?
It depends on your goals. RDTE currently yields 44.20% Trailing Twelve Months (TTM) while QDVO yields 10.69%. Higher yield means more current income per dollar invested, but may come with different risk, growth, or NAV characteristics. Compare total return and payout sustainability — not just the headline yield.
What is the difference between RDTE and QDVO?
Roundhill Investments - Russell 2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (RDTE) is an ETF listed on CBOE. Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF (QDVO) is an ETF listed on AMEX. Side-by-side metrics on this page cover yield, fees, returns, drawdowns, holdings overlap and dividend history when available.
Which is cheaper, RDTE or QDVO?
QDVO has the lower expense ratio. RDTE charges 0.97% a year and QDVO charges 0.56%, a difference of $41 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which has performed better, RDTE or QDVO?
Over the last 1 year, QDVO has the higher total return with dividends reinvested: RDTE returned -20.7% and QDVO returned 2.1%. Past performance does not predict future returns.
Which is riskier, RDTE or QDVO?
Measured by the worst peak-to-trough decline over the last five years, RDTE has been riskier: RDTE fell as much as 24.4% and QDVO as much as 17.7%. Their betas are 1.04 and 1.02.
How often do RDTE and QDVO pay dividends?
RDTE pays weekly and QDVO pays monthly.
How much income does $10,000 in RDTE vs QDVO generate?
At current TTM yields, $10,000 in RDTE would generate roughly $368.32 per month ($4420 annually). The same amount in QDVO would produce about $89.08 per month ($1069 annually). Actual payouts vary with distribution changes and reinvestment.
Can I hold both RDTE and QDVO?
Yes. Many income investors hold both to diversify strategy or index exposure. Whether the combination actually diversifies depends on overlapping holdings and factor exposure. Model both inside Dividend Wealth to see combined income, sector mix, and forecast impact.
Where can I compare RDTE vs QDVO with my full portfolio?
Create a free Dividend Wealth account to import or enter holdings, forecast dividend income, and see how RDTE and QDVO fit alongside the rest of your portfolio. A 14-day free trial of Standard is available with no credit card required; a limited Free plan is also available.
Related comparisons
For informational and educational purposes only. Not investment advice. Past performance and current yields do not guarantee future results. Verify figures independently before making investment decisions.