Dividend comparison
QQQH vs QQQI: Which Is Better for Income?
Fees, yield, total returns, drawdowns, holdings overlap and dividend history for NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF, side by side. Updated October 21, 2026.
- Fees. Both charge about 0.68% a year, so cost is not what separates them.
- Income. QQQI pays more income, yielding 14.11% over the last twelve months versus 9.00% for QQQH. That is about $510 more a year on $10,000. Both pay monthly.
- Performance. Over the last 1 year, QQQI returned 0.7% versus 0.7% for QQQH, with dividends reinvested. $10,000 would have grown to $10,069 in QQQI and $10,066 in QQQH.
- Risk. QQQH has been the bumpier ride. Its worst peak-to-trough decline over the last 1 year was -61.1%, against -20.0% for QQQI.
- Diversification. QQQH holds 10 positions and QQQI holds 10. The ten largest positions make up 49.4% of QQQH and 47.0% of QQQI.
- Overlap. 98% of the two portfolios overlap by weight, across 97 shared holdings. Owning both adds little diversification.
- Size. QQQI is the larger fund with $15.1 billion in assets, against $398 million for QQQH.
Bottom line: QQQI has the edge on these figures, with more income today and smaller drawdowns. QQQH does not lead on any of the measures compared here. With 98% overlap, most investors would hold one or the other rather than both.
| Metric | QQQH NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF | QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield (TTM) | 9.00% | 14.11% |
| Dividend / share (TTM) | $4.91 | $7.64 |
| Payout frequency | Monthly | Monthly |
| Last dividend | $0.4190 on Sep 25, 2026 | $0.6339 on Sep 18, 2026 |
| Ex-dividend date | Sep 23, 2026 | Sep 16, 2026 |
| Dividend growth (CAGR) | 1.6% over 4 yrs | — |
| Price | $54.55 | $54.16 |
| Dividend growth streak | 2 years | — |
| Beta | 0.78 | 0.93 |
| Max drawdown (5Y) | -61.1% | -20.0% |
| Market cap | $395.7M | $14.89B |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NASDAQ |
| Expense ratio | 0.68% | 0.68% |
| Assets under management | $398.3M | $15.08B |
| Number of holdings | 10 | 10 |
| Top 10 concentration | 49.4% | 47.0% |
QQQH
$75.04/mo
$900 /yr at 9.00% yield
QQQI
$117.57/mo
$1411 /yr at 14.11% yield
| Year | QQQH | QQQI |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $4.6160 | $7.4435 |
| 2024 | $3.9219 | — |
| 2023 | $3.2157 | — |
| 2022 | $3.3471 | — |
| 2021 | $4.3378 | — |
Payouts are variable rather than contractual, are often taxed as ordinary income, and a fund that pays out more than the strategy earns will see its net asset value drift down over time.
What QQQH vs QQQI actually do
It owns Nasdaq-100 constituents and applies the same call strategy of sold and purchased index options, sized actively rather than as a fixed full overwrite. Nasdaq-100 volatility is structurally higher, so the option premium collected is larger and the monthly distribution is bigger than the S&P 500 version. NDX options are also section 1256 contracts, so the same 60/40 tax treatment and loss-harvesting mechanics apply.
Suits someone who wants technology-heavy exposure converted into monthly cash with attention paid to tax character. A poor fit if you are holding the Nasdaq-100 specifically to compound growth, because the call overlay gives away the tail of exactly the rallies that index is bought for.
Aggressive tax-aware income
| Period | QQQH | QQQI |
|---|---|---|
| 1 month | -0.75% | -0.42% |
| 3 months | 0.24% | -0.09% |
| Year to date | 0.46% | 0.56% |
| 1 year | 0.66% | 0.69% |
| 3 years | 48.52% | — |
| 5 years | 7.47% | — |
- QQQH
- QQQI
Both series indexed to 100 on 2024-01-30 using the adjusted closing price series. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
- QQQH
- QQQI
| Largest shared holdings | QQQH weight | QQQI weight |
|---|---|---|
| NVDANVIDIA Corp | 8.06% | 8.20% |
| AAPLApple Inc | 7.69% | 7.81% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 6.10% | 6.11% |
| AMZNAmazon.com Inc | 4.39% | 4.47% |
| MUMicron Technology Inc | 4.32% | 4.40% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 3.70% | 3.81% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 3.19% | 3.25% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 3.09% | 3.13% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 3.00% | 2.96% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 2.88% | 2.90% |
QQQH10 holdings total
Quick verdict
QQQI has the edge on these figures, with more income today and smaller drawdowns. QQQH does not lead on any of the measures compared here. With 98% overlap, most investors would hold one or the other rather than both. Model the holding inside your real portfolio before deciding.
Frequently asked questions
Is QQQH or QQQI better for dividend income?
What is the difference between QQQH and QQQI?
Which is cheaper, QQQH or QQQI?
Which has performed better, QQQH or QQQI?
Which is riskier, QQQH or QQQI?
How much do QQQH and QQQI overlap?
How often do QQQH and QQQI pay dividends?
How much income does $10,000 in QQQH vs QQQI generate?
Can I hold both QQQH and QQQI?
Where can I compare QQQH vs QQQI with my full portfolio?
Related comparisons
For informational and educational purposes only. Not investment advice. Past performance and current yields do not guarantee future results. Verify figures independently before making investment decisions.