Dividend comparison
IWY vs FSPGX: Which Is Better?
Fees, yield, total returns, drawdowns, holdings overlap and dividend history for iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Idx, side by side. Updated October 21, 2026.
IWY vs FSPGX: key differences
The short answer, from the latest data on this page.
- Income. Their trailing yields are almost the same: 0.34% for IWY and 0.37% for FSPGX. IWY pays quarterly, FSPGX pays semi-annual.
- Performance. Over the last 5 years, IWY returned 83.2% versus 74.7% for FSPGX, with dividends reinvested. $10,000 would have grown to $18,316 in IWY and $17,472 in FSPGX.
- Risk. Their worst declines over the last 5 years were similar: -32.7% for IWY and -32.7% for FSPGX from peak to trough.
- Diversification. IWY holds 101 positions and FSPGX holds 100. The ten largest positions make up 60.9% of IWY and 56.8% of FSPGX.
- Overlap. 87% of the two portfolios overlap by weight, across 71 shared holdings. Owning both adds little diversification.
- Dividend growth. IWY grew its yearly payout 3.5% a year over the last 4 years, versus -29.9% for FSPGX.
Bottom line: IWY has the edge on these figures, with stronger 5-year returns and faster dividend growth. FSPGX does not lead on any of the measures compared here. With 87% overlap, most investors would hold one or the other rather than both.
Side-by-side snapshot
Trailing twelve-month figures where available. Higher yield is highlighted — not a buy recommendation.
| Metric | IWY iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF | FSPGX Fidelity Large Cap Growth Idx |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield (TTM) | 0.34% | 0.37% |
| Dividend / share (TTM) | $0.97 | $0.18 |
| Payout frequency | Quarterly | Semi-annual |
| Last dividend | $0.2310 on Sep 18, 2026 | $0.0210 on Jun 29, 2026 |
| Ex-dividend date | Sep 15, 2026 | Jun 26, 2026 |
| Dividend growth (CAGR) | 3.5% over 4 yrs | -29.9% over 4 yrs |
| Price | $287.93 | $48.03 |
| Dividend growth streak | 1 year | 2 years |
| Beta | 1.17 | 1.16 |
| Max drawdown (5Y) | -32.7% | -32.7% |
| Market cap | $16.10B | $44.27B |
| Exchange | AMEX | NASDAQ |
| Expense ratio | 0.20% | — |
| Assets under management | $16.23B | — |
| Number of holdings | 101 | 100 |
| Top 10 concentration | 60.9% | 56.8% |
Income on a $10,000 investment
Illustrative only — assumes current TTM yield stays constant. Actual distributions change.
IWY
$2.81/mo
$34 /yr at 0.34% yield
FSPGX
$3.12/mo
$37 /yr at 0.37% yield
Dividend history
Total dividends paid per share in each calendar year. IWY pays quarterly; FSPGX pays semi-annual.
| Year | IWY | FSPGX |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $1.0051 | $0.1590 |
| 2024 | $0.9968 | $0.1450 |
| 2023 | $1.1862 | $0.2160 |
| 2022 | $1.0596 | $0.1790 |
| 2021 | $0.8742 | $0.6570 |
Strategy: Large-cap growth
Funds that hold the faster-growing half of the large-cap market, selected by measures like earnings growth, sales growth and price momentum. In practice that means heavy weights in technology and communication companies, with the largest few names often making up a third of the fund or more. Dividends are small because growth companies reinvest their cash instead of paying it out.
Concentration in a handful of mega-cap stocks makes these funds swing harder than the broad market in both directions, and they offer little current income.
Performance
Total returns with dividends reinvested, from the adjusted closing price series. $10,000 invested on Oct 20, 2021 would now be worth $18,316 in IWY and $17,472 in FSPGX.
| Period | IWY | FSPGX |
|---|---|---|
| 1 month | -0.57% | -0.74% |
| 3 months | 3.03% | 2.58% |
| Year to date | 3.97% | 3.80% |
| 1 year | 4.31% | 3.71% |
| 3 years | 89.48% | 87.76% |
| 5 years | 83.16% | 74.72% |
- IWY
- FSPGX
Both series indexed to 100 on 2021-10-20 using the adjusted closing price series. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Sector allocation
Weight of each sector within the fund. Sectors are aligned on the same row so the two funds can be read against each other directly.
- IWY
- FSPGX
IWY vs FSPGX holdings overlap
87% overlap by weight, with 71 holdings in common. Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for every stock both funds own, so 100% would mean identical portfolios.
| Largest shared holdings | IWY weight | FSPGX weight |
|---|---|---|
| NVDANVIDIA | 15.02% | 15.45% |
| AAPLAPPLE | 8.32% | 7.45% |
| GOOGLALPHABET CLASS A | 6.07% | 5.93% |
| MSFTMICROSOFT | 6.34% | 5.65% |
| AVGOBROADCOM INC | 5.08% | 5.17% |
| GOOGALPHABET CLASS C | 4.89% | 4.79% |
| MUMICRON TECHNOLOGY | 3.54% | 3.24% |
| TSLATESLA INC | 3.78% | 3.23% |
| METAMETA PLATFORMS CLASS A | 4.35% | 3.09% |
| LLYELI LILLY | 3.55% | 2.77% |
Top 10 holdings
Largest positions by portfolio weight.
IWY101 holdings total
Quick verdict
IWY has the edge on these figures, with stronger 5-year returns and faster dividend growth. FSPGX does not lead on any of the measures compared here. With 87% overlap, most investors would hold one or the other rather than both. Model the holding inside your real portfolio before deciding.
Still deciding? Compare them in your portfolio
Forecast dividend income, track payouts, and see how IWY vs FSPGX fits with the rest of your holdings. Free to start — no credit card required for the trial.
Frequently asked questions
Is IWY or FSPGX better for dividend income?
It depends on your goals. IWY currently yields 0.34% Trailing Twelve Months (TTM) while FSPGX yields 0.37%. Higher yield means more current income per dollar invested, but may come with different risk, growth, or NAV characteristics. Compare total return and payout sustainability — not just the headline yield.
What is the difference between IWY and FSPGX?
iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF (IWY) is an ETF listed on AMEX. Fidelity Large Cap Growth Idx (FSPGX) is an ETF listed on NASDAQ. Side-by-side metrics on this page cover yield, fees, returns, drawdowns, holdings overlap and dividend history when available.
Which has performed better, IWY or FSPGX?
Over the last 5 years, IWY has the higher total return with dividends reinvested: IWY returned 83.2% and FSPGX returned 74.7%. Past performance does not predict future returns.
Which is riskier, IWY or FSPGX?
Measured by the worst peak-to-trough decline over the last five years, IWY has been riskier: IWY fell as much as 32.7% and FSPGX as much as 32.7%. Their betas are 1.17 and 1.16.
How much do IWY and FSPGX overlap?
About 87% of the two portfolios overlap by weight, across 71 shared holdings. The largest shared positions are NVDA, AAPL, GOOGL. Holding both adds little diversification.
How often do IWY and FSPGX pay dividends?
IWY pays quarterly and FSPGX pays semi-annual.
How much income does $10,000 in IWY vs FSPGX generate?
At current TTM yields, $10,000 in IWY would generate roughly $2.81 per month ($34 annually). The same amount in FSPGX would produce about $3.12 per month ($37 annually). Actual payouts vary with distribution changes and reinvestment.
Can I hold both IWY and FSPGX?
Yes. Many income investors hold both to diversify strategy or index exposure. Whether the combination actually diversifies depends on overlapping holdings and factor exposure. Model both inside Dividend Wealth to see combined income, sector mix, and forecast impact.
Where can I compare IWY vs FSPGX with my full portfolio?
Create a free Dividend Wealth account to import or enter holdings, forecast dividend income, and see how IWY and FSPGX fit alongside the rest of your portfolio. A 14-day free trial of Standard is available with no credit card required; a limited Free plan is also available.
Related comparisons
For informational and educational purposes only. Not investment advice. Past performance and current yields do not guarantee future results. Verify figures independently before making investment decisions.