Dividend comparison

IWM vs VBR: Which Is Better?

Fees, yield, total returns, drawdowns, holdings overlap and dividend history for iShares Russell 2000 ETF and Vanguard Morningstar Small-Cap Value ETF, side by side. Updated October 21, 2026.

IWM vs VBR: key differences
The short answer, from the latest data on this page.
  • Fees. VBR is cheaper at 0.05% a year versus 0.19% for IWM. On $10,000 that is $14 a year less in fees.
  • Income. VBR pays more income, yielding 1.85% over the last twelve months versus 0.99% for IWM. That is about $86 more a year on $10,000. Both pay quarterly.
  • Performance. Over the last 5 years, VBR returned 45.7% versus 28.7% for IWM, with dividends reinvested. $10,000 would have grown to $14,570 in VBR and $12,869 in IWM.
  • Risk. IWM has been the bumpier ride. Its worst peak-to-trough decline over the last 5 years was -31.9%, against -24.2% for VBR.
  • Diversification. IWM holds 1,981 positions and VBR holds 841. The ten largest positions make up 3.3% of IWM and 5.7% of VBR.
  • Dividend growth. VBR grew its yearly payout 7.2% a year over the last 4 years, versus 5.1% for IWM.

Bottom line: IWM fits better if you care most about broader diversification. VBR fits better if you care most about lower fees, more income today, stronger 5-year returns, smaller drawdowns and faster dividend growth.

Side-by-side snapshot
Trailing twelve-month figures where available. Higher yield is highlighted — not a buy recommendation.
MetricIWM
iShares Russell 2000 ETF
VBR
Vanguard Morningstar Small-Cap Value ETF
Dividend yield (TTM)0.99%1.85%
Dividend / share (TTM)$2.73$4.42
Payout frequencyQuarterlyQuarterly
Last dividend$0.7504 on Sep 18, 2026$1.0300 on Sep 30, 2026
Ex-dividend dateSep 15, 2026Sep 28, 2026
Dividend growth (CAGR)5.1% over 4 yrs7.2% over 4 yrs
Price$275.78$238.81
Dividend growth streak1 year5 years
Beta1.140.97
Max drawdown (5Y)-31.9%-24.2%
Market cap$77.59B$64.10B
ExchangeAMEXAMEX
Expense ratio0.19%0.05%
Assets under management$74.85B$64.10B
Number of holdings1981841
Top 10 concentration3.3%5.7%
Income on a $10,000 investment
Illustrative only — assumes current TTM yield stays constant. Actual distributions change.

IWM

$8.25/mo

$99 /yr at 0.99% yield

VBR

$15.42/mo

$185 /yr at 1.85% yield

Dividend history
Total dividends paid per share in each calendar year. IWM pays quarterly; VBR pays quarterly.
YearIWMVBR
2025$2.5547$4.1371
2024$2.5305$3.9201
2023$2.7021$3.8078
2022$2.5850$3.2283
2021$2.0900$3.1305
Strategy: Small and mid cap
Funds that hold companies below the large-cap tier, where there is more room for growth and less coverage by analysts. Small-cap indexes differ meaningfully: some screen for profitability, some include every listed company, and value-tilted funds lean toward the cheapest names. Those rules drive more of the difference between funds than fees do.

Smaller companies are more sensitive to recessions and borrowing costs, so drawdowns run deeper than in large-cap funds.

Performance
Total returns with dividends reinvested, from the adjusted closing price series. $10,000 invested on Oct 20, 2021 would now be worth $12,869 in IWM and $14,570 in VBR.
PeriodIWMVBR
1 month-2.93%0.45%
3 months-5.41%-2.18%
Year to date12.79%12.76%
1 year12.26%14.59%
3 years70.87%63.48%
5 years28.69%45.70%
  • IWM
  • VBR
68114160202120222023202420252026129146

Both series indexed to 100 on 2021-10-20 using the adjusted closing price series. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Sector allocation
Weight of each sector within the fund. Sectors are aligned on the same row so the two funds can be read against each other directly.
  • IWM
  • VBR
0%8%15%23%31%Financial Services18.1%17.6%Healthcare20.5%9.3%Industrials13.7%15.5%Technology14.0%10.7%Consumer Cyclical8.5%13.9%Health Care20.2%Financials19.4%Real Estate5.8%10.5%Information Technology13.2%Energy6.8%5.1%Other30.8%17.4%
IWM vs VBR holdings overlap
At least 0% overlap by weight, with 0 holdings in common. Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for every stock both funds own, so 100% would mean identical portfolios.
Top 10 holdings
Largest positions by portfolio weight.

IWM1981 holdings total

NameWeight
MOG-AMOOG INC CLASS A0.36%
BTSGBRIGHTSPRING HEALTH SERVICES INC0.35%
UMBFUMB FINANCIAL0.34%
SMSM ENERGY0.33%
GKOSGLAUKOS0.33%
FROGJFROG0.32%
EATBRINKER INTERNATIONAL INC0.31%
FCFSFIRSTCASH HOLDINGS INC0.31%
ONBOLD NATIONAL BANCORP0.31%
CTRECARETRUST REIT0.30%

VBR841 holdings total

NameWeight
MRNAModerna Inc0.79%
JBLJabil Inc0.68%
WSMWilliams-Sonoma Inc0.61%
ATOAtmos Energy Corp0.60%
FFIVF5 Inc0.57%
SWSmurfit Westrock PLC0.53%
TPRTapestry Inc0.52%
THCTenet Healthcare Corp0.47%
VTRSViatris Inc0.46%
OMCOmnicom Group Inc0.46%

Quick verdict

IWM fits better if you care most about broader diversification. VBR fits better if you care most about lower fees, more income today, stronger 5-year returns, smaller drawdowns and faster dividend growth. Model the holding inside your real portfolio before deciding.

Still deciding? Compare them in your portfolio
Forecast dividend income, track payouts, and see how IWM vs VBR fits with the rest of your holdings. Free to start — no credit card required for the trial.

Frequently asked questions

Is IWM or VBR better for dividend income?
It depends on your goals. IWM currently yields 0.99% Trailing Twelve Months (TTM) while VBR yields 1.85%. Higher yield means more current income per dollar invested, but may come with different risk, growth, or NAV characteristics. Compare total return and payout sustainability — not just the headline yield.
What is the difference between IWM and VBR?
iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) is an ETF listed on AMEX. Vanguard Morningstar Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR) is an ETF listed on AMEX. Side-by-side metrics on this page cover yield, fees, returns, drawdowns, holdings overlap and dividend history when available.
Which is cheaper, IWM or VBR?
VBR has the lower expense ratio. IWM charges 0.19% a year and VBR charges 0.05%, a difference of $14 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which has performed better, IWM or VBR?
Over the last 5 years, VBR has the higher total return with dividends reinvested: IWM returned 28.7% and VBR returned 45.7%. Past performance does not predict future returns.
Which is riskier, IWM or VBR?
Measured by the worst peak-to-trough decline over the last five years, IWM has been riskier: IWM fell as much as 31.9% and VBR as much as 24.2%. Their betas are 1.14 and 0.97.
How often do IWM and VBR pay dividends?
Both pay quarterly. The most recent payments were $0.7504 for IWM and $1.0300 for VBR.
How much income does $10,000 in IWM vs VBR generate?
At current TTM yields, $10,000 in IWM would generate roughly $8.25 per month ($99 annually). The same amount in VBR would produce about $15.42 per month ($185 annually). Actual payouts vary with distribution changes and reinvestment.
Can I hold both IWM and VBR?
Yes. Many income investors hold both to diversify strategy or index exposure. Whether the combination actually diversifies depends on overlapping holdings and factor exposure. Model both inside Dividend Wealth to see combined income, sector mix, and forecast impact.
Where can I compare IWM vs VBR with my full portfolio?
Create a free Dividend Wealth account to import or enter holdings, forecast dividend income, and see how IWM and VBR fit alongside the rest of your portfolio. A 14-day free trial of Standard is available with no credit card required; a limited Free plan is also available.

Related comparisons

For informational and educational purposes only. Not investment advice. Past performance and current yields do not guarantee future results. Verify figures independently before making investment decisions.