Dividend comparison
IVV vs SPLG: Which Is Better?
Fees, yield, total returns, drawdowns, holdings overlap and dividend history for iShares Core S&P 500 ETF and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF, side by side. Updated October 21, 2026.
- Fees. SPLG is cheaper at 0.02% a year versus 0.03% for IVV. On $10,000 that is $1 a year less in fees.
- Income. IVV pays more income, yielding 1.09% over the last twelve months versus 0.76% for SPLG. That is about $32 more a year on $10,000. Both pay quarterly.
- Performance. Over the last 5 years, SPLG returned 92.6% versus 80.1% for IVV, with dividends reinvested. $10,000 would have grown to $19,261 in SPLG and $18,014 in IVV.
- Risk. Their worst declines over the last 5 years were similar: -24.5% for IVV and -24.5% for SPLG from peak to trough.
- Diversification. IVV holds 504 positions and SPLG holds 504. The ten largest positions make up 38.6% of IVV and 40.0% of SPLG.
- Overlap. At least 66% of the two portfolios overlap by weight, across 86 shared holdings.
- Dividend growth. IVV grew its yearly payout 8.8% a year over the last 4 years, versus 6.8% for SPLG.
- Size. IVV is the larger fund with $883.7 billion in assets, against $95.7 billion for SPLG.
Bottom line: IVV fits better if you care most about more income today and faster dividend growth. SPLG fits better if you care most about stronger 5-year returns.
| Metric | IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | SPLG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield (TTM) | 1.09% | 0.76% |
| Dividend / share (TTM) | $8.40 | $0.67 |
| Payout frequency | Quarterly | Quarterly |
| Last dividend | $2.2026 on Sep 18, 2026 | $0.2392 on Jun 16, 2026 |
| Ex-dividend date | Sep 15, 2026 | Jun 12, 2026 |
| Dividend growth (CAGR) | 8.8% over 4 yrs | 6.8% over 4 yrs |
| Price | $772.35 | $87.89 |
| Dividend growth streak | 4 years | 5 years |
| Beta | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Max drawdown (5Y) | -24.5% | -24.5% |
| Market cap | $880.18B | $106.73B |
| Exchange | AMEX | AMEX |
| Expense ratio | 0.03% | 0.02% |
| Assets under management | $883.68B | $95.72B |
| Number of holdings | 504 | 504 |
| Top 10 concentration | 38.6% | 40.0% |
IVV
$9.06/mo
$109 /yr at 1.09% yield
SPLG
$6.37/mo
$76 /yr at 0.76% yield
| Year | IVV | SPLG |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $8.0399 | $0.9074 |
| 2024 | $7.6453 | $0.8796 |
| 2023 | $6.8988 | $0.8046 |
| 2022 | $6.3933 | $0.7610 |
| 2021 | $5.7272 | $0.6970 |
Current income is low and outside your control, so these need pairing with something else if the portfolio has to produce cash today.
What IVV vs SPLG actually do
It holds the full index at market-cap weights and, like VOO, is structured as an open-end fund, so it can reinvest income internally and lend out securities. Differences against the other S&P 500 trackers come down to fee, share price, spread and where the fund trades commission-free, not to what is inside it. Tracking difference between the cheap S&P 500 funds is small enough that platform and tax considerations usually decide the choice.
Suits an investor who wants core S&P 500 exposure and already holds other iShares funds or trades on a platform where iShares is cheapest. There is no income case for it beyond the index's own dividends.
Core holding
It is an open-end fund tracking the S&P 500, so unlike its older sibling it can reinvest income internally and lend securities. Its headline expense ratio is the lowest among the large S&P 500 trackers, and its lower share price makes it easier to fill an odd-lot allocation precisely. The trade-off is a smaller options market and slightly wider spreads than SPY, which only matters if you trade actively.
Suits a buy-and-hold investor who wants S&P 500 exposure at the smallest possible fee, and small accounts where a lower share price reduces leftover cash. Not the right tool for anyone running options strategies against the position.
Core holding
| Period | IVV | SPLG |
|---|---|---|
| 1 month | 0.97% | 1.37% |
| 3 months | 3.43% | 13.17% |
| Year to date | 12.76% | 9.82% |
| 1 year | 14.49% | 26.50% |
| 3 years | 87.50% | 76.27% |
| 5 years | 80.14% | 92.61% |
- IVV
- SPLG
Both series indexed to 100 on 2021-06-18 using the adjusted closing price series. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
- IVV
- SPLG
| Largest shared holdings | IVV weight | SPLG weight |
|---|---|---|
| NVDANVIDIA | 7.91% | 8.33% |
| AAPLAPPLE | 7.54% | 6.78% |
| MSFTMICROSOFT | 5.97% | 6.85% |
| AMZNAMAZON.COM INC | 3.88% | 3.78% |
| GOOGLALPHABET CLASS A | 3.04% | 2.64% |
| AVGOBROADCOM INC | 2.40% | 2.98% |
| METAMETA PLATFORMS CLASS A | 2.34% | 2.77% |
| GOOGALPHABET CLASS C | 2.44% | 2.13% |
| TSLATESLA INC | 1.56% | 2.20% |
| BRK-BBERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC CLASS B | 1.49% | 1.50% |
IVV504 holdings total
Quick verdict
IVV fits better if you care most about more income today and faster dividend growth. SPLG fits better if you care most about stronger 5-year returns. Model the holding inside your real portfolio before deciding.
Frequently asked questions
Is IVV or SPLG better for dividend income?
What is the difference between IVV and SPLG?
Which is cheaper, IVV or SPLG?
Which has performed better, IVV or SPLG?
Which is riskier, IVV or SPLG?
How much do IVV and SPLG overlap?
How often do IVV and SPLG pay dividends?
How much income does $10,000 in IVV vs SPLG generate?
Can I hold both IVV and SPLG?
Where can I compare IVV vs SPLG with my full portfolio?
Related comparisons
For informational and educational purposes only. Not investment advice. Past performance and current yields do not guarantee future results. Verify figures independently before making investment decisions.