Dividend comparison
GPIQ vs TDAQ: Which Is Better for Income?
Fees, yield, total returns, drawdowns, holdings overlap and dividend history for Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF and TappAlpha Innovation 100 Growth & Daily Income ETF, side by side. Updated October 21, 2026.
- Fees. GPIQ is cheaper at 0.35% a year versus 0.68% for TDAQ. On $10,000 that is $33 a year less in fees.
- Income. TDAQ pays more income, yielding 17.25% over the last twelve months versus 10.27% for GPIQ. That is about $698 more a year on $10,000. Both pay monthly.
- Performance. Over the last 1 year, GPIQ returned 7.9% versus 0.5% for TDAQ, with dividends reinvested. $10,000 would have grown to $10,794 in GPIQ and $10,050 in TDAQ.
- Risk. GPIQ has been the bumpier ride. Its worst peak-to-trough decline over the last 1 year was -100.0%, against -16.0% for TDAQ.
- Diversification. GPIQ holds 107 positions and TDAQ holds 104. The ten largest positions make up 47.9% of GPIQ and 143.6% of TDAQ.
- Overlap. 93% of the two portfolios overlap by weight, across 89 shared holdings. Owning both adds little diversification.
- Size. GPIQ is the larger fund with $6.4 billion in assets, against $452 million for TDAQ.
Bottom line: GPIQ fits better if you care most about lower fees and stronger 1-year returns. TDAQ fits better if you care most about more income today and smaller drawdowns. With 93% overlap, most investors would hold one or the other rather than both.
| Metric | GPIQ Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF | TDAQ TappAlpha Innovation 100 Growth & Daily Income ETF |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield (TTM) | 10.27% | 17.25% |
| Dividend / share (TTM) | $5.77 | $4.50 |
| Payout frequency | Monthly | Monthly |
| Last dividend | $0.5088 on Oct 7, 2026 | $0.3825 on Oct 21, 2026 |
| Ex-dividend date | Oct 1, 2026 | Sep 15, 2026 |
| Price | $56.13 | $26.11 |
| Dividend growth streak | 1 year | — |
| Beta | 1.16 | 1.41 |
| Max drawdown (5Y) | -100.0% | -16.0% |
| Market cap | $1.19B | $10.3M |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | CBOE |
| Expense ratio | 0.35% | 0.68% |
| Assets under management | $6.37B | $452.3M |
| Number of holdings | 107 | 104 |
| Top 10 concentration | 47.9% | 143.6% |
GPIQ
$85.60/mo
$1027 /yr at 10.27% yield
TDAQ
$143.77/mo
$1725 /yr at 17.25% yield
| Year | GPIQ | TDAQ |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $5.1860 | — |
| 2024 | $4.8875 | — |
Payouts are variable rather than contractual, are often taxed as ordinary income, and a fund that pays out more than the strategy earns will see its net asset value drift down over time.
What GPIQ vs TDAQ actually do
Rather than overwriting the whole portfolio every month, the manager sells calls against roughly 25% to 75% of the equity exposure and adjusts that share with market conditions. Leaving part of the book uncovered is the deliberate design choice: it produces a smaller distribution than a full overwrite but keeps more of a rally. Fees sit well below most options-income peers, which matters over time in a category where the overlay already caps returns.
Suits an investor who wants Nasdaq-100 income but is not willing to give up the whole upside to get the highest headline yield. Less suitable for someone comparing purely on distribution rate, since a partial overwrite by design pays less than a full one.
Balanced income and growth
| Period | GPIQ | TDAQ |
|---|---|---|
| 1 month | -1.32% | -2.50% |
| 3 months | 0.27% | -1.21% |
| Year to date | 7.10% | 0.15% |
| 1 year | 7.94% | 0.50% |
| 3 years | 599.00% | — |
| 5 years | — | — |
- GPIQ
- TDAQ
Both series indexed to 100 on 2025-09-04 using the adjusted closing price series. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
- GPIQ
- TDAQ
| Largest shared holdings | GPIQ weight | TDAQ weight |
|---|---|---|
| NVDANVIDIA CORPORATION | 8.20% | 8.13% |
| AAPLAPPLE INC. | 7.84% | 7.90% |
| MSFTMICROSOFT CORPORATION | 6.23% | 6.19% |
| MUMICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. | 4.42% | 4.32% |
| AMZNAMAZON.COM INC | 4.36% | 4.24% |
| AMDADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC. | 3.82% | 3.75% |
| METAMETA PLATFORMS INC-CLASS A | 3.34% | 3.32% |
| GOOGLALPHABET INC. | 3.96% | 3.15% |
| TSLATESLA INC. | 2.95% | 2.93% |
| SPCXSPACE EXPLORATION TECHNOLOGIES CORP. | 2.74% | 2.73% |
GPIQ107 holdings total
Quick verdict
GPIQ fits better if you care most about lower fees and stronger 1-year returns. TDAQ fits better if you care most about more income today and smaller drawdowns. With 93% overlap, most investors would hold one or the other rather than both. Model the holding inside your real portfolio before deciding.
Frequently asked questions
Is GPIQ or TDAQ better for dividend income?
What is the difference between GPIQ and TDAQ?
Which is cheaper, GPIQ or TDAQ?
Which has performed better, GPIQ or TDAQ?
Which is riskier, GPIQ or TDAQ?
How much do GPIQ and TDAQ overlap?
How often do GPIQ and TDAQ pay dividends?
How much income does $10,000 in GPIQ vs TDAQ generate?
Can I hold both GPIQ and TDAQ?
Where can I compare GPIQ vs TDAQ with my full portfolio?
Related comparisons
For informational and educational purposes only. Not investment advice. Past performance and current yields do not guarantee future results. Verify figures independently before making investment decisions.