Dividend comparison
COST vs WMT: Which Is Better for Income?
Fees, yield, total returns, drawdowns, holdings overlap and dividend history for Costco Wholesale Corporation and Walmart Inc., side by side. Updated October 21, 2026.
- Income. WMT pays more income, yielding 0.82% over the last twelve months versus 0.56% for COST. That is about $27 more a year on $10,000. Both pay quarterly.
- Performance. Over the last 5 years, WMT returned 157.1% versus 122.4% for COST, with dividends reinvested. $10,000 would have grown to $25,709 in WMT and $22,243 in COST.
- Risk. COST has been the bumpier ride. Its worst peak-to-trough decline over the last 5 years was -31.4%, against -25.7% for WMT.
- Dividend growth. COST grew its yearly payout 13.3% a year over the last 4 years, versus 5.7% for WMT.
Bottom line: COST fits better if you care most about faster dividend growth. WMT fits better if you care most about more income today, stronger 5-year returns and smaller drawdowns.
| Metric | COST Costco Wholesale Corporation | WMT Walmart Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield (TTM) | 0.56% | 0.82% |
| Dividend / share (TTM) | $5.54 | $0.98 |
| Payout frequency | Quarterly | Quarterly |
| Last dividend | $1.4700 on Aug 7, 2026 | $0.2475 on Sep 8, 2026 |
| Ex-dividend date | Oct 30, 2026 | Dec 11, 2026 |
| Next payment | $1.4700 on Nov 13, 2026 | $0.2475 on Jan 4, 2027 |
| Dividend growth (CAGR) | 13.3% over 4 yrs | 5.7% over 4 yrs |
| Price | $994.61 | $117.85 |
| Payout ratio (TTM) | 26.6% | 34.9% |
| Dividend growth streak | 20 years | 50 years |
| Beta | 0.87 | 0.58 |
| Max drawdown (5Y) | -31.4% | -25.7% |
| Market cap | $438.30B | $945.50B |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NASDAQ |
COST
$4.64/mo
$56 /yr at 0.56% yield
WMT
$6.86/mo
$82 /yr at 0.82% yield
| Year | COST | WMT |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $5.0600 | $0.9125 |
| 2024 | $19.5000 | $0.8125 |
| 2023 | $3.9600 | $0.7567 |
| 2022 | $3.4900 | $0.7433 |
| 2021 | $3.0700 | $0.7300 |
A single company can cut or suspend its dividend, and one holding can fall far more than a diversified fund.
| Period | COST | WMT |
|---|---|---|
| 1 month | 11.09% | 10.42% |
| 3 months | 5.71% | 5.29% |
| Year to date | 15.34% | 6.46% |
| 1 year | 6.40% | 11.02% |
| 3 years | 86.35% | 129.32% |
| 5 years | 122.43% | 157.09% |
- COST
- WMT
Both series indexed to 100 on 2021-10-20 using the adjusted closing price series. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Quick verdict
COST fits better if you care most about faster dividend growth. WMT fits better if you care most about more income today, stronger 5-year returns and smaller drawdowns. Model the holding inside your real portfolio before deciding.
Frequently asked questions
Is COST or WMT better for dividend income?
What is the difference between COST and WMT?
Which has performed better, COST or WMT?
Which is riskier, COST or WMT?
How often do COST and WMT pay dividends?
How much income does $10,000 in COST vs WMT generate?
Can I hold both COST and WMT?
Where can I compare COST vs WMT with my full portfolio?
For informational and educational purposes only. Not investment advice. Past performance and current yields do not guarantee future results. Verify figures independently before making investment decisions.