Dividend comparison
BSV vs SCHZ: Which Is Better for Income?
Fees, yield, total returns, drawdowns, holdings overlap and dividend history for Vanguard Short-Term Bond ETF and Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF, side by side. Updated October 21, 2026.
- Fees. Both charge about 0.03% a year, so cost is not what separates them.
- Income. SCHZ pays more income, yielding 4.32% over the last twelve months versus 4.11% for BSV. That is about $21 more a year on $10,000. Both pay monthly.
- Performance. Over the last 5 years, BSV returned 5.2% versus -2.8% for SCHZ, with dividends reinvested. $10,000 would have grown to $10,517 in BSV and $9,716 in SCHZ.
- Risk. SCHZ has been the bumpier ride. Its worst peak-to-trough decline over the last 5 years was -17.4%, against -7.9% for BSV.
- Diversification. SCHZ holds 12,612 positions and BSV holds 30.
- Dividend growth. BSV grew its yearly payout 26.7% a year over the last 4 years, versus 12.9% for SCHZ.
- Size. BSV is the larger fund with $69.6 billion in assets, against $10.6 billion for SCHZ.
Bottom line: BSV fits better if you care most about stronger 5-year returns, smaller drawdowns and faster dividend growth. SCHZ fits better if you care most about broader diversification.
| Metric | BSV Vanguard Short-Term Bond ETF | SCHZ Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield (TTM) | 4.11% | 4.32% |
| Dividend / share (TTM) | $3.15 | $0.96 |
| Payout frequency | Monthly | Monthly |
| Last dividend | $0.2680 on Oct 5, 2026 | $0.0821 on Oct 7, 2026 |
| Ex-dividend date | Oct 1, 2026 | Oct 1, 2026 |
| Dividend growth (CAGR) | 26.7% over 4 yrs | 12.9% over 4 yrs |
| Price | $76.53 | $22.27 |
| Dividend growth streak | 4 years | 4 years |
| Beta | 0.38 | 0.99 |
| Max drawdown (5Y) | -7.9% | -17.4% |
| Market cap | $69.61B | $10.67B |
| Exchange | AMEX | AMEX |
| Expense ratio | 0.03% | 0.03% |
| Assets under management | $69.60B | $10.64B |
| Number of holdings | 30 | 12612 |
| Top 10 concentration | — | 1.1% |
BSV
$34.26/mo
$411 /yr at 4.11% yield
SCHZ
$35.99/mo
$432 /yr at 4.32% yield
| Year | BSV | SCHZ |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $3.0206 | $0.9465 |
| 2024 | $2.6138 | $0.8993 |
| 2023 | $1.8927 | $0.7647 |
| 2022 | $1.1262 | $0.5998 |
| 2021 | $1.1739 | $0.5827 |
Bond prices fall when interest rates rise, and long-duration funds can lose as much as stocks in a fast rate-hiking cycle.
| Period | BSV | SCHZ |
|---|---|---|
| 1 month | -0.16% | -0.31% |
| 3 months | -1.49% | -1.68% |
| Year to date | -2.89% | -1.63% |
| 1 year | -2.67% | -1.89% |
| 3 years | 10.31% | 14.56% |
| 5 years | 5.17% | -2.84% |
- BSV
- SCHZ
Both series indexed to 100 on 2021-10-20 using the adjusted closing price series. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
- BSV
- SCHZ
Quick verdict
BSV fits better if you care most about stronger 5-year returns, smaller drawdowns and faster dividend growth. SCHZ fits better if you care most about broader diversification. Model the holding inside your real portfolio before deciding.
Frequently asked questions
Is BSV or SCHZ better for dividend income?
What is the difference between BSV and SCHZ?
Which is cheaper, BSV or SCHZ?
Which has performed better, BSV or SCHZ?
Which is riskier, BSV or SCHZ?
How often do BSV and SCHZ pay dividends?
How much income does $10,000 in BSV vs SCHZ generate?
Can I hold both BSV and SCHZ?
Where can I compare BSV vs SCHZ with my full portfolio?
Related comparisons
For informational and educational purposes only. Not investment advice. Past performance and current yields do not guarantee future results. Verify figures independently before making investment decisions.