Dividend comparison
BIL vs SWVXX: Which Is Better for Income?
Fees, yield, total returns, drawdowns, holdings overlap and dividend history for State Street SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF and Schwab Prime Advantage Money Fund - Investor, side by side. Updated October 21, 2026.
- Income. Their trailing yields are almost the same: 3.66% for BIL and 3.58% for SWVXX. Both pay monthly.
- Performance. Over the last 3 years, BIL returned 12.9% versus 1.7% for SWVXX, with dividends reinvested. $10,000 would have grown to $11,288 in BIL and $10,173 in SWVXX.
- Risk. Their worst declines over the last 3 years were similar: -0.3% for BIL and 0.0% for SWVXX from peak to trough.
- Dividend growth. SWVXX grew its yearly payout 223.8% a year over the last 3 years, versus 45.1% for BIL.
Bottom line: BIL fits better if you care most about stronger 3-year returns. SWVXX fits better if you care most about faster dividend growth.
| Metric | BIL State Street SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF | SWVXX Schwab Prime Advantage Money Fund - Investor |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield (TTM) | 3.66% | 3.58% |
| Dividend / share (TTM) | $3.35 | $0.04 |
| Payout frequency | Monthly | Monthly |
| Last dividend | $0.2632 on Oct 6, 2026 | $0.0030 on Sep 30, 2026 |
| Ex-dividend date | Oct 1, 2026 | Sep 30, 2026 |
| Dividend growth (CAGR) | 45.1% over 3 yrs | 223.8% over 4 yrs |
| Price | $91.58 | $1.00 |
| Beta | 0.00 | 0.02 |
| Max drawdown (5Y) | -0.3% | 0.0% |
| Market cap | $51.19B | $245.26B |
| Exchange | AMEX | NASDAQ |
| Expense ratio | 0.14% | — |
| Assets under management | $51.17B | — |
| Number of holdings | 34 | — |
BIL
$30.51/mo
$366 /yr at 3.66% yield
SWVXX
$29.84/mo
$358 /yr at 3.58% yield
| Year | BIL | SWVXX |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $3.7727 | $0.0406 |
| 2024 | $4.5966 | $0.0500 |
| 2023 | $4.5009 | $0.0491 |
| 2022 | $1.2361 | $0.0156 |
| 2021 | — | $0.0004 |
There is no growth here by design, and purchasing power erodes whenever the after-tax yield sits below inflation.
What BIL vs SWVXX actually do
It tracks a Bloomberg index of 1 to 3 month US Treasury bills and works the same way as its peers: constant rollover, a yield that follows the short end of the curve, and monthly distributions. It launched in 2007, well before the current crop of cash ETFs, and carries a higher expense ratio than the newer entrants. On a product where every fund holds nearly identical government paper, that fee gap comes almost directly out of the yield you receive.
Suits anyone needing a liquid cash holding, particularly where a platform makes it the cheapest or most accessible option. Where an equivalent bill fund charges less, there is little in the portfolio itself to justify the difference.
Capital preservation
| Period | BIL | SWVXX |
|---|---|---|
| 1 month | 0.32% | 0.00% |
| 3 months | 0.91% | 0.00% |
| Year to date | 2.89% | 0.00% |
| 1 year | 3.67% | 0.00% |
| 3 years | 12.88% | 1.73% |
| 5 years | 18.87% | — |
- BIL
- SWVXX
Both series indexed to 100 on 2023-04-17 using the adjusted closing price series. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
- BIL
- SWVXX
Quick verdict
BIL fits better if you care most about stronger 3-year returns. SWVXX fits better if you care most about faster dividend growth. Model the holding inside your real portfolio before deciding.
Frequently asked questions
Is BIL or SWVXX better for dividend income?
What is the difference between BIL and SWVXX?
Which has performed better, BIL or SWVXX?
Which is riskier, BIL or SWVXX?
How often do BIL and SWVXX pay dividends?
How much income does $10,000 in BIL vs SWVXX generate?
Can I hold both BIL and SWVXX?
Where can I compare BIL vs SWVXX with my full portfolio?
Related comparisons
For informational and educational purposes only. Not investment advice. Past performance and current yields do not guarantee future results. Verify figures independently before making investment decisions.